However, during the recent surge in online discussions about its “price explosion,” this token’s total liquidation volume across all platforms ranked 4th, only behind Bitcoin, ETH, and XAU, reaching approximately $23.25 million. If not for Trump’s TACO move boosting gold’s volatility, SIREN would have been 3rd.

The token’s price once approached $5, corresponding to a market cap of about $3.675 billion, briefly squeezing into the top 30 of the total 加密currency market cap ranking, surpassing established tokens like OKB and UNI.
In a sluggish market, this is not the first time we’ve seen such a phenomenon. $PIPPIN, $RIVER, $BEAT, $MYX… By examining the questions surrounding $SIREN, what lessons can we draw from these similar situations?
Are “Leverage Scams” Predictable?
As early as March 5th, @c_ckoko posted a tweet pointing out, “$SIREN is clearly under absolute control of holdings. This is a cross-exchange method to harvest users.”

His tweet effectively explains how this “leverage scam” operates: the poor spot liquidity on exchanges allows for creating large price swings with minimal capital, which then affects the Binance futures price for harvesting.
Furthermore, as suggested at the end of his tweet, the $SIREN futures price index was adjusted. At the time of his tweet, the weightings affecting the $SIREN Binance futures price index were: Gate spot 50%, Kucoin spot 12.5%, Binance futures 12.5%, Binance Alpha 25%. After that, following two adjustments, the current futures price index weightings are: Gate spot 25%, Kucoin spot 12.5%, Binance futures 12.5%, Binance Alpha 50%.
According to Arkham data, Gate’s $SIREN holdings on March 22nd were only 64,000 tokens.

In such a situation, a trading volume of $100,000 could create a candlestick with nearly 40% volatility on a minute chart.

Looking at the open interest, $SIREN showed obvious anomalies starting from February 8th. The open interest, which had long hovered between $3-5 million, suddenly surged to $58.83 million.

Of course, abnormal signs do not necessarily lead to a specific inevitable outcome. After all, the chips are in the hands of the controlling whales, and we cannot be sure how they will execute the harvest.
方法论
First is accumulation of holdings, hoarding a large amount of spot tokens while also opening large long positions to push the price higher.
On-chain analyst Ember (@EmberCN) aggregated the control situation of $SIREN and found that the portion controlled by whales, verifiable on-chain alone, was as high as 88.5%. If including the portion deposited by whales into CEXs, this number would be even higher.

The tweet above also suggested that DWF Labs might be the controller in this incident, but DWF Labs co-founder Zac denied this claim in a group chat.
After pushing the price higher, the whales lure in short sellers, then open short positions themselves to make retail investors believe a local top is forming.

From the funding rate chart above, it can be seen that starting from March 14th, $SIREN frequently exhibited high negative funding rates. Short sellers continuously paid fees to the whales’ long positions, and the whales used these “free” funds to continue pushing the price higher. In the early hours of March 23rd, another violent fluctuation of 78% occurred on Gate spot within 10 minutes, corresponding to a trading volume of only about $450,000. The price of $SIREN surged from $2.75 to nearly $5. This means many people were liquidated.

At this point, $SIREN might not be finished yet. Looking at it mechanically, the whales could next close their long positions, dump their spot holdings, creating a massive bearish candlestick, and then close their short positions at a cost far lower than their opening price. Comparing the price movements of $RIVER, $POWER, and $BEAT with $SIREN in one chart, it seems $SIREN is still missing the final harvest.

As this article was about to be published, the speculation above was confirmed:

Conclusion
Regardless of whether the current market is sluggish, the emergence of such harvesting schemes is always negative. Admittedly, some skilled traders might manage to get a share of the whales’ profits amidst the information fog, but for the vast majority of retail investors, it’s nothing more than an utterly unfair gamble.
When such a blatant harvesting scheme once appeared among the top 30 cryptocurrencies by market cap, all I can do is sigh.
本文来源于互联网: SIREN, A Meticulously Designed Leverage Harvest
Related: 24H Hot 代币s and Key News|U.S. Treasury Secretary Beshent: Recommends Simultaneous Wash Nomination Hearings and Powell Investigation; Total Unrealized Losses for Strategy and Bitmine Companies Reach $12.671 Billion (February 10)
1. Hot Tokens on CEXs Top 10 CEX Trading Volume and 24-hour Price Changes: BNB: +0.62% BTC: -0.12% ETH: +1.92% SOL: +0.69% CITY: +2.46% ALCX: -1.10% PORTO: +1.44% Binance Life: +3.86% LAZIO: +1.12% QUICK: +2.61% 24-hour Top Gainers (Data Source: OKX): AXS: +12.25% G: +10.89% CFG: +9.63% ZRO: +8.62% SPACE: +8.44% ALLO: +7.51% BARD: +6.66% YB: +5.62% RON: +5.53% XPL: +5.43% 24-hour Top Gainers – Tokenized Stocks (Data Source: msx.com): PSTG: +10.44% RMBS: +9.17% GLW: +8.31% BTCS: +6.94% BTOG: +6.07% NVO: +4.76% VERB: +4.18% ICG: +4.17% NTAP: +3.77% SUIG: +3.65% 2. On-chain Trending Memes (Data Source: GMGN): Gentlemen WhiteWhale USELESS WAR Buttcoin Headlines US Treasury Secretary Bessent Suggests Holding Warsh Nomination Hearing Concurrently with Powell Investigation US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has suggested holding the Federal Reserve chair nomination hearing…







