In-depth research report on the oracle track: the intelligence center of the on-chain world

1. Industry foundation and development context: Why is the oracle the intelligence center of the blockchain?

The essence of blockchain is a decentralized trust machine that ensures the immutability of on-chain data and the autonomy of the system through consensus mechanisms, encryption algorithms and distributed ledger structures. However, due to its closedness and self-consistency, blockchain is naturally unable to actively access off-chain data. From weather forecasts to financial prices, from voting results to off-chain identity authentication, the on-chain system cannot see or know changes in the outside world. Therefore, Oracle, as an information bridge between on-chain and off-chain, plays a key role in sensing the outside world. It is not a simple data porter, but the intelligence hub of blockchain – only when the off-chain information provided by the oracle is injected into the smart contract can the on-chain financial logic be correctly executed, thus connecting the real world with the decentralized universe.

1.1 The Logic of the Birth of Information Islands and Oracles

Early Ethereum or Bitcoin networks faced a fundamental problem: on-chain smart contracts are blind. They can only perform calculations based on data that has been written to the chain, and cannot actively obtain any off-chain information. For example: DeFi protocols cannot obtain the real-time price of ETH/USD on their own; GameFi games cannot synchronize scores of real-world events; RWA protocols cannot determine whether real assets (such as real estate, bonds) are liquidated or transferred.

The emergence of oracles is to solve the fatal flaw of this information island. They capture data from the outside world and transmit it to the chain in a centralized or decentralized manner, so that smart contracts have context and world state, which can drive more complex and practical decentralized applications.

1.2 Three key evolution stages: from centralization to modularization

The development of oracle technology has gone through three stages, each of which significantly expanded the boundaries of its role in the blockchain world:

Phase 1: Centralized Oracles: Early oracles mostly adopted the form of a single data source + central node push, such as early Augur, Provable, etc., but their security and anti-censorship capabilities were extremely low and they were easily tampered with, hijacked, or interrupted by failures.

Phase 2: Decentralized Data Aggregation (Chainlink Paradigm): The emergence of Chainlink has pushed oracles to a new level. It builds a decentralized data provision network through multiple data providers (Data Feeds) + node network aggregation + pledge and incentive mechanisms. Security and verifiability are greatly enhanced, and it has also become the mainstream of the industry.

Phase 3: Modular, Verifiable Oracles: With the growth of demand and the emergence of new technologies such as AI, modular oracles have become a trend. Projects such as UMA, Pyth, Supra, RedStone, Witnet, Ritual, and Light Protocol have proposed innovative mechanisms including Crypto-Proofed Data, ZK-Proofs, Off-chain Computation Verification, and Custom Data Layer, making oracles evolve towards flexibility, composability, low latency, and auditability.

1.3 Why is the oracle an “intelligence hub” rather than a “peripheral tool”?

In traditional narratives, oracles are often likened to the sensory system of blockchain, that is, the eyes, ears, nose and tongue of blockchain. However, in the current highly complex on-chain ecosystem, this metaphor is no longer sufficient: in DeFi, oracles determine the benchmark reality of liquidation, arbitrage, and transaction execution, and data delays or manipulation will directly lead to systemic risks; in RWA, oracles assume the synchronization function of off-chain asset digital twins and are the only proof interface for the legal existence of real assets on the chain; in the field of AI+Crypto, oracles become the data entry point for model feeding, determining whether intelligent agents can operate effectively; in cross-chain bridges and re-pledge protocols, oracles also shoulder the tasks of cross-chain state synchronization, security guidance, and verification of consensus correctness.

This means that the oracle is no longer just a sensory organ, but a nerve center and intelligence network in the complex ecosystem on the chain. Its role is no longer perception, but the core of the infrastructure to establish a consensus reality and synchronize the on-chain universe with the off-chain world.

From a national perspective, data is the oil of the 21st century, and oracles are the channel controllers for data flow. The network that controls the oracles controls the generation of real cognition on the chain: whoever 去中心化金融nes the price controls the financial order; whoever synchronizes the truth builds the cognitive structure; whoever monopolizes the entrance defines the standard of trusted data. Therefore, oracles are becoming the core infrastructure in DePIN, DeAI, and RWA modules.

2. 市場 structure and project comparison: a head-on confrontation between centralized legacy and decentralized upstarts

Although oracles are regarded as the intelligence center of blockchain, the controllers of this center have long been in a state of quasi-centralized monopoly. Traditional oracle giants represented by Chainlink are not only the creators of industry infrastructure, but also the biggest beneficiaries of order and rules. However, with the rise of emerging trends such as modular narratives, DePIN paradigms, and ZK verification paths, the market structure of oracles is undergoing an explicit power reconstruction. The changes in this field are not simple product competition, but a philosophical confrontation over who defines the reality on the chain.

The significance of Chainlink to the oracle track is similar to the symbolic status of Ethereum in the early days of smart contracts. It took the lead in establishing a complete network architecture based on the combination of data aggregation, node staking, and economic incentives, and became an irreplaceable on-chain benchmark reality provider after the DeFi summer. Whether it is financial protocols such as Aave, Compound, and Synthetix, or Layer 2 networks such as Polygon and Arbitrum, a large number of systematic operations are heavily dependent on Chainlinks data supply. However, it is precisely this kind of indispensable that brings two hidden dangers: one is the risk of single point failure of the on-chain system caused by over-reliance; the other is the transparency crisis and data review space brought about by implicit centralization. Although Chainlinks node network is nominally decentralized, its actual operation is often concentrated on a few validators, such as traditional institutional nodes such as Deutsche Telekom, Swisscom, and Blockdaemon; and its Off-Chain Reporting (OCR) mechanism, data source screening, update frequency selection and other decisions are mostly opaque and difficult to govern in a community. It is more like a central publishing system that inputs a trusted version of reality into the blockchain world, rather than a truly decentralized, censorship-resistant data supply market. It is this point that opens up a value breakthrough for latecomers.

The emergence of Pyth Network is a deep confrontation with the Chainlink model. Pyth did not copy the traditional data aggregation paradigm, but directly returned the power of data upload to the data source itself, such as exchanges, market makers, and infrastructure providers. This first-party data source upload model greatly reduces the relay level of data under the chain, improves real-time and native performance, and also transforms the oracle from a data aggregation tool to a raw pricing infrastructure. This is very attractive for high-frequency, low-latency scenarios such as derivatives trading, perpetual contracts, and game logic on the blockchain. But at the same time, it also brings a deeper problem: Pyths data sources mostly come from 加密貨幣 exchanges and liquidity providers-these participants are both information providers and market participants. Whether this both athlete and referee structure can truly get rid of price manipulation and conflicts of interest is an unverified trust gap.

Unlike Pyth, which focuses on data sources and update efficiency, RedStone and UMA choose to take a different approach and cut into the structural layer of the oracles trust path. The operating mechanism of traditional oracles is mostly based on feeding price and confirmation, that is, the node uploads and broadcasts the data to the smart contract, and the contract directly uses this data as the basis for the status. The biggest problem with this mechanism is that there is no real data verifiable path on the chain. In other words, the contract cannot determine whether the uploaded data really comes from the information source specified off-chain, nor can it audit whether its path is complete and neutral. The verifiable data packet mechanism proposed by RedStone solves this problem: by encapsulating the off-chain data in an encrypted manner into a data body with a signature verification structure, and unpacking and verifying it immediately by the execution contract, the certainty, security and flexibility of on-chain data calls are greatly improved.

Similarly, the Optimistic Oracle paradigm advocated by UMA is more radical. It assumes that the oracle itself does not need to provide absolutely correct data every time, but introduces economic games to resolve disputes when they arise. This optimistic mechanism leaves most of the data processing logic to the off-chain, and only returns to on-chain governance through the dispute arbitration module when objections arise. The advantages of this mechanism are extremely high cost efficiency and system scalability, which is suitable for complex financial contracts, insurance agreements and long-tail information scenarios, but its disadvantages are also very obvious: once the incentive mechanism within the system is not well designed, it is very easy for attackers to repeatedly challenge and tamper with the game manipulation of the prophecy.

Emerging projects such as Supra, Witnet, and Ritual are innovating in more detailed dimensions: some are building bridges between off-chain computing and encrypted verification paths, some are trying to modularize oracle services so that they can be freely embedded in different blockchain operating environments, and some are simply rewriting the incentive structure between nodes and data sources to form a customized supply chain for trusted data on the chain. These projects have not yet formed a mainstream network effect, but behind them is a clear signal: the oracle track has moved from a consensus dispute to a trust path dispute, and from a single price provision to a comprehensive game of trusted reality generation mechanism.

We can see that the oracle market is undergoing a transformation from infrastructure monopoly to trust diversity. Old projects have strong ecological binding and user path dependence, while emerging projects use verifiability, low latency, and customization as weapons to try to cut the cracks left by centralized oracles. But no matter which side we stand on, we must admit a reality: whoever can define the reality on the chain has the benchmark control of the entire crypto world. This is not a technical battle, but a battle of definition rights. The future of oracles is destined to no longer be as simple as moving data onto the chain.

3. Potential Space and Boundary Expansion: From Financial Information Flow to On-chain RWA Infrastructure

The essence of an oracle is to provide verifiable real-world input for on-chain systems, which makes it play a core role in the crypto world that goes far beyond data transmission. Looking back over the past decade, the oracle started from the price feed function in decentralized finance (DeFi), and is now expanding to a broader boundary: from a basic data provider for on-chain financial transactions, to a central system for mapping real assets (RWA), a bridge node for cross-chain interoperability, and even an on-chain empirical foundation that supports complex structures such as on-chain law, identity, governance, and AI-generated data.

Infrastructure for the flow of financial information: In the golden age of DeFi’s rise (2020-2022), the main role of oracles is focused on “price feeding” – providing real-time prices of external market assets for on-chain contracts. This demand has driven the rapid development of projects such as Chainlink, Band Protocol, and DIA, and has also spawned the first generation of oracle standards. However, in actual operation, the complexity of DeFi contracts continues to escalate, and oracles are forced to “go beyond prices”: insurance agreements require climate data, CDP models require economic indicators, perpetual contracts require volatility and volume distribution, and structured products require complex multi-factor data. This marks the evolution of oracles from price tools to access layers of multiple data sources, and their role is gradually becoming “systematized.”

Furthermore, with the large-scale introduction of off-chain debts, government bonds, fund shares and other real assets by projects such as MakerDAO, Centrifuge, Maple, and Ondo, the role of the oracle has begun to evolve into a trusted registrar of on-chain RWA (Real-World Assets). In this process, the oracle is no longer just a pipeline for inputting data, but an on-chain authenticator, status updater, and executor of revenue distribution of RWA – a neutral system with fact-driven capabilities.

The source of the credibility of on-chain RWA: The biggest problem of RWA has never been technical difficulty, but how to make the representation on the chain consistent with the legal and asset status off the chain. In traditional systems, this consistency is guaranteed by lawyers, audits, supervision and paper processes, while on the chain, oracles become the key to reconstructing this mechanism. For example, if an on-chain bond is mortgaged by an offline property, how does the smart contract know whether the property has been seized, appraised, rented, sold or mortgaged to others? All this information exists off the chain and cannot be natively on the chain. At this time, the task of the oracle is no longer simply synchronizing data, but to build an on-chain trust snapshot by connecting government registration systems, IoT devices, audit processes and reputation mechanisms. It must constantly refresh this snapshot to ensure the consistency of the contract status with the actual status. This capability pushes the oracle to a more complex application boundary, and even requires the integration of legal, physical and political trust systems.

At the same time, we also see that RedStone and Centrifuge have cooperated to upload the cash flow, maturity status, default information, etc. of RWA assets to the chain in a modular data format, providing atomic input for transactions, risk control, and liquidation in the liquidity market. This data standardization and trusted update mechanism is almost equivalent to building an audit chip for the on-chain financial system, which is the foundation for the entire on-chain financial ecosystem to map to reality.

The evolution of the oracles cross-asset layer: Another trend worth noting is that the oracle is gradually evolving from the asset data provision layer to the cross-asset coordination layer. With the rapid rise of cross-chain protocols such as LayerZero and Wormhole, the single-chain data barrier has begun to be broken, but there is still a serious gap in the synchronization of asset status. For example, a stablecoin on Ethereum may rely on the liquidation price on Arbitrum, while a structured product on Solana may involve the yield of RWA claims on Polygon. This multi-chain interactive financial structure requires a logical hub to coordinate the acquisition, update, verification and broadcast of data. Future oracles, especially those structured oracle systems that support cross-chain deployment, off-chain collaboration and contract composability, will be more like an on-chain API middle platform – it not only provides data, but also has the ability to call, verify, convert, integrate and distribute, thus becoming the data intelligence layer of the entire Web3 application layer.

After the oracle gains stability on RWA, the next boundary will be the data mapping of people and behavior. In other words, it will not only record the state of things, but also capture peoples behavior – the on-chain credit system, DID (decentralized identity), on-chain litigation arbitration, and even the authenticity verification of AI-generated content will require auditable on-chain input ports. This direction has already begun to emerge in projects such as EigenLayer, Ritual, and HyperOracle: they either let the oracle verify the results of the off-chain model operation, or connect the AI model output to the on-chain element process, or let the auditor assume the factual responsibility in staking mode.

This trend shows that the boundaries of the oracle have expanded from financial information flow to the entire data map of on-chain order generation, becoming the infrastructure for the real world to move towards on-chain civilization. It is no longer just a megaphone for transmitting prices, but a digital bridge that connects information, value and trust.

IV. Trend Outlook and Investment Recommendations: Structural opportunities have arrived, focusing on three directions

The technical maturity and industry attention of oracles often show the characteristics of non-linear cycle crossing – after the public chain infrastructure enters the stage of stock competition, it, as the core data base for linking the real world on the chain, has ushered in a stronger strategic position. Whether it is the rise of Layer 2, the implementation of RWA, or the combination of AI and on-chain computing, oracles have become an unavoidable trust anchor. Therefore, looking forward to the next three years, the investment logic of the oracle track will shift from market value imagination in the hype stage to revaluation of cash flow value brought by structural growth.

4.1. Structural trends are clear and supply and demand curves are re-matched

As traditional financial institutions and on-chain protocols accelerate their integration, the asset status, legal status, and behavioral status of the real world off-chain must enter the on-chain system in a structured, standardized, and verifiable manner. This trend brings about two fundamental changes:

The demand for high-frequency, customized data streams has risen sharply. Oracles are no longer simple price relay systems, but computing nodes that support a series of complex logics (such as automatic liquidation, yield mapping, and state changes).

The economic attributes of data are more prominent, and its pricing model has gradually transitioned from Gas cost + node incentives to B2B enterprise-level subscription + SLA data agreement + commercial contract responsibilities, forming a stable cash flow.

The transition in supply and demand directly drives the project valuation model from narrative driven to income driven, and also provides a new investment anchor for long-term holders and strategic funds. Especially for the top RWA projects, AI computing chains, and DID architectures, choosing a reliable, stable, and high-throughput oracle service provider is an irreplaceable reliance at the contract level.

4.2. Three key directions have long-term Alpha potential

Under this new development paradigm, we suggest focusing on three types of oracle development paths, which represent the extended capabilities of oracles as on-chain “intelligence hubs” in different dimensions:

1) Modularization, application-side native oracles: close to business means close to value: Compared with the traditional general oracle model, the new generation of projects such as RedStone, PYTH, and Witnet emphasize on-demand service and on-site deployment, embedding the oracle logic into the application contract or VM layer. This model is more compatible with the needs of high-frequency trading and structured asset protocols, and also makes data transmission faster, more accurate, and less expensive. The advantage of such projects is that they have a natural product-protocol stickiness. Once a DeFi or RWA project selects a certain type of oracle, the migration cost is extremely high, which means medium- and long-term binding income and defensive moats.

2) AI and Oracle Fusion Narrative: Interface Layer for Verification, Filtering and Fact Generation: As AI models are widely involved in the crypto ecosystem, how to verify the authenticity of their generated content, behavior predictions and external calls has become an unavoidable basic issue. Oracle is the logical anchor of this problem: it not only provides data, but also verifies whether the data comes from a trusted computing process and whether it satisfies the multi-party consensus mechanism. Projects such as HyperOracle, Ritual, and Aethos have begun to try to provide provable AI call results for on-chain contracts through zkML, trusted hardware, encrypted reasoning, etc., and connect to the chain in the form of oracles. This direction has high technical barriers and high capital attention, and is a potential detonation point for the next round of high Beta.

3) RWA and identity-bound oracles: off-chain legal status mapper: From the asset universal message standard of Chainlink and Swift, to the synchronization of multi-asset income status on Centrifuge, to the introduction of a third-party evaluation model by Goldfinch, RWA is rapidly building a trusted mechanism that relies on a neutral information layer. The core of this mechanism relies on a oracle system that can trustfully put off-chain laws, asset registration, behavioral credit and other content on the chain. This type of project is more inclined to infrastructure logic, and the development path is highly related to regulatory policies, but once an industry standard is formed (such as Chainlinks CCIP), it has an exponential network effect and is a grayscale consensus asset suitable for long-term layout.

4.3. Reconstruction of investment logic: from “feed price narrative” to “on-chain order” pricing

In the past, the market often regarded oracles as ancillary tools of the hot DeFi track, and market value assessment and investment behavior mostly fluctuated with the market. However, in the future, the oracle itself will gradually obtain an independent value assessment mechanism. The reasons are: it plays an irreplaceable role as an injector of facts in the on-chain protocol; it has a stable and calculable source of protocol revenue (such as Chainlinks data pricing model has formed a B2B business subscription logic); it undertakes the underlying information coordination tasks in multiple structural growth tracks such as RWA, AI, and governance, which has a multiplier effect.

Therefore, we recommend that investors should not only evaluate projects based on market capitalization size and trading popularity, but should screen oracle assets with long-term value potential based on the following three main lines: whether they have native deep binding with protocols, chains, and financial institutions; whether they have established a data-fact-consensus business closed loop; and whether they have scalability advantages in the next generation of scenarios (RWA, AI, cross-chain).

In summary, oracles are no longer supporting roles on the edge of the crypto narrative, but are gradually becoming the factual benchmark system and order generation engine of the on-chain world. Structural opportunities have already been formed, and investment logic needs to be reconstructed urgently.

5. Conclusion: The era of structural dividends in the oracle track has arrived

The oracle track is at the forefront of the evolution of the blockchain ecosystem, playing a core role in bridging the information between the on-chain world and the real world. With the increasing complexity of on-chain applications and the demand for real assets to be on-chain, the oracle is no longer just a price data provider, but has become the intelligence center and order generation engine for the trusted execution of smart contracts. The multi-dimensional improvement of technology and the in-depth expansion of application scenarios have brought unprecedented development space and value revaluation opportunities to the oracle.

In the future, oracle projects will develop in a more decentralized, modular and scenario-based direction. The integration of AI and on-chain data and the on-chain process of RWA will inject continuous growth momentum into it. Investors should examine the value of oracle projects from three dimensions: on-chain protocol binding, closed-loop business model, and scalability, and focus on innovative forces with long-term moats and structural growth potential. Overall, the oracle track has gradually shifted from a supporting role to the intelligence center of the blockchain world. Its ecological value and investment opportunities cannot be ignored, and the era of structural dividends has arrived.

This article is sourced from the internet: In-depth research report on the oracle track: the intelligence center of the on-chain world

Related: The White House Cryptocurrency Summit: A political show of flattery and sloganeering (with full live broadcast)

Original｜Odaily Planet Daily Author: jk On the afternoon of March 7, local time in the United States, US President Donald Trump hosted the first cryptocurrency industry summit at the White House , convening representatives of regulatory agencies such as the Ministry of Finance and crypto industry leaders for a closed-door discussion. Although the meeting was promoted as defining the direction of crypto regulation in the next four years, no substantive policy documents were released during the entire event, and the official live broadcast was interrupted 20 minutes after the opening. In the public meeting process, there were only regulatory officials taking turns to speak, and major crypto industry leaders praising Trump one by one. Praise from the industry, but nothing else Previously, the first crypto summit at the White House…