أيقونة_تثبيت_ios_web أيقونة_تثبيت_ios_web أيقونة_تثبيت_أندرويد_ويب

Helius raised $500 million to buy SOL, but the Solana community now just wants it to change its name

تحليلمنذ 3 أيامجديد وايت
2٬709 0

Author|Azuma (@azuma_eth)

Helius raised 0 million to buy SOL, but the Solana community now just wants it to change its name

Digital asset treasury companies focusing on Solana (SOL) are emerging in large numbers.

Following Forward Industries’ completion of a $1.65 billion financing round and its rapid purchase of 6.82 million SOLs, Helius Medical Technologies (HSDT), a US-listed company, completed another $500 million in private equity financing on September 15th to transform itself into a SOL treasury company. The financing was led by Pantera Capital and Summer Capital. The financing terms included the sale of common stock at $6.881 per share and the sale of accompanying warrants at $10.134 per share. If all the warrants are exercised, the total amount raised is expected to exceed $1.25 billion.

However, compared to the Solana community’s enthusiasm for Forward Industries, the community’s discussion around Helius is somewhat awkward.

The problem lies in the name of Helius – long before this Helius transformed into the SOL treasury company, there was another Helius in the Solana ecosystem. This Helius is the largest infrastructure development company in the Solana ecosystem. Its CEO 0xmert can be said to be the most active developer in the entire Solana ecosystem (personally, I think the “one of” can be omitted). Not only has he played the role of a voice leader in the Solana community for many years, but he has also played a key role in many key upgrades or maintenance nodes in Solana’s history.

Helius raised 0 million to buy SOL, but the Solana community now just wants it to change its name

After the official announcement of the treasury company Helius, the first reaction of many community users who were unaware of the details was that the treasury should be led by the infrastructure company Helius, but this is not the case.

0xmert himself responded on X to say he had nothing to do with the incident: “Personal statement: Seriously, I have nothing to do with this – the name overlap is just a coincidence. The universe is just playing tricks on me. I reiterate that I am not involved in this, whether it is Helius, Helium, Helio, Heliux or Helicopter. ”

Helius raised 0 million to buy SOL, but the Solana community now just wants it to change its name

Subsequently, the “coincidence” of the two companies’ names quickly became a hot topic of discussion in the Solana community, with the community hotly debating whether this was “forced reputation-riding” or “pure coincidence.”

  • Deep Ventures investor Mike Chan directly called out Pantera, saying, “Why did you choose this name when everyone knows that the most famous Solana infrastructure company is called Helius? Didn’t you consult 0xmert about this? This is very strange.”
  • Mister Todd, an international influencer, commented on Pantera founder Dan Morehead’s post: “It’s incredible you chose the name Helius to emulate 0xmert’s work. I believe these shell company middlemen could have had more options. I hope this will ultimately benefit Helius’s development, as their work is crucial to the Solana ecosystem.”
  • Solana developer korg.sol quipped, “Let’s just call everything Helius from now on so there’s no confusion.”
  • NickyScanz, a member of the Marinade Finance team, followed up by saying, “When I launch my own Solana company, I’m going to name it Helius. You can’t stop me.”
  • Ranger developer Dhrumil also mentioned: “My next company will also be named Helius, so I joined for free.”

Obviously, judging from the statements of many community members, the Solana community as a whole is not satisfied with the “name-duplicate” operation of the treasury company Helius. After all, the reputation of the infrastructure company Helius in the Solana ecosystem in the past is obvious to all .

Although some people say that this is purely coincidental and that Pantera and other institutions may have chosen Helius as a treasury shell simply because it is the most convenient operation object among listed companies from a financial perspective, in theory they are exactly like some other treasury companies (such as Justin Sun changing SRM Entertainment to Tron) and announced in advance in the financing announcement that they will change their name in order to avoid potential confusion, but in fact they did not do so.

Last night, Mike Dudas, co-founder of The Block and founder of 6 MV, publicly called on the Solana community to force the treasury company Helius to change its name. “GM, except for those smart-aleck guys. They established a SOL treasury company called Helius yesterday, but they didn’t know that Solana’s largest infrastructure development company has already been called this name. This morning, I will officially launch the action to force this DAT to change its name. Everyone, join us!

Helius raised 0 million to buy SOL, but the Solana community now just wants it to change its name

Below Mike Dudas, many people, including Compound founder Robert Leshner, expressed their support, but the most interesting statement came from Solana co-founder Raj (Raj Gokal) – “We always say we hope to see more teams like Helius, it seems that we can no longer just wish for it…”

Helius raised 0 million to buy SOL, but the Solana community now just wants it to change its name

As one of the two founders of Solana, Raj undoubtedly represents the attitude of the top management of Solana, and his subtle expression more or less shows his dissatisfaction with the “duplicate name” of the treasury company Helius.

Looking ahead, it is not ruled out that the treasury company Helius will change its company name in order to cater to community sentiment (of course, it may also insist on not changing it). However, whether this operation that loses the community’s favor right from the start will have a greater impact at a time when competition in the treasury field is becoming increasingly competitive, it will take time to answer.

هذا المقال مصدره من الانترنت: Helius raised $500 million to buy SOL, but the Solana community now just wants it to change its nameRecommended Articles

Related: Web3 is becoming more and more “benevolent”: a collective shift in the industry’s maturity stageRecommended Articles

行业生态的节奏变化:从“快”到“稳” 在早期,叙事驱动和投机风潮构成了加密生态的主旋律。比特币减半、DeFi Summer、NFT 狂潮——这些故事曾在短时间内汇聚了大量资金与注意力,推动了基础设施的加速建设。然而,快速奔跑也带来隐忧:过度依赖融资、轻视长期落地,导致许多项目昙花一现。 快节奏的悖论在于:它确实催生了创新,但也掏空了用户与资本的耐心。随着 2022–2023 年行业进入冷静期,投机泡沫逐渐褪去,市场情绪趋于理性。这并非退潮,而是进入了真正内化成长的阶段。 据 CoinسوقCap 数据显示,比特币和以太坊等主流币重新巩固了主导地位:2022 年比特币市值占比曾跌至约 39%,而 2023 年均值回升到 45.6%,2024 年进一步升至 51.9%,2025 年迄今已接近 59.3%。这意味着经历上一轮熊市洗礼后,资金更倾向流向比特币、以太坊等头部资产。 与之相对,长尾的山寨币和 Memecoin 虽在局部掀起浪花,但整体增长乏力。例如 2023 年第二季度掀起的 Pepe 等 Memecoin 热潮使 Pepecoin 市值截至 2024 年底一度飙升至约 15 亿美元高峰,但此后迅速回落到 7 亿美元以下;2024 年底的 meme 发射平台 pumpfun 曽一度金狗倍出,平台手续费收入超过 Tier 2 交易所,但随着市场理性回归目前手续费已降低至最高点的 5%。 (红线:pumpfun 累计交易量;蓝柱:pumpfun 当日手续费;source: Dune) 这类缺乏基本面支撑的meme币往往“昙花一现”,难以长期留住市值。相比之下,比特币、以太坊等具备网络效应和应用生态的加密资产在本轮复苏中表现更稳健,其市值增长和占比提升显著高于绝大多数长尾项目。 投资者风险偏好降低和价值回归,使市场资金加速向头部集中,市场信号十分清晰:投机项目越来越难长期维系,资金集中回归头部资产。 (Source: تشفير rank) VC 投资逻辑也发生了转变。2022 年行业创投募资达到顶峰,但在 2023 年骤然萎缩。进入 2024–2025 年,资金回暖但重心不同:投资者更偏好团队背景扎实、MVP跑通且具备现金流模型的平台,而非靠叙事驱动的早期实验性项目。 面对一级市场投资机会的聚焦与萎缩,产业资本正将目光转向二级市场和公开市场机会。 一方面,传统 VC 对早期加密项目投资日趋谨慎;另一方面,大型机构资金开始通过投资公开交易的加密标的来布局。例如,加密投资机构 Pantera 近期投入 3 亿美元专门投资“数字资产司库(Digital Asset Treasury, DAT)”模式的公司,押注这些将加密资产纳入财报的上市公司能够获得优于直接持币或 ETF 的回报。 这些 DAT 公司通过在公开市场发行股票融资,用筹得资金大量持有比特币、以太坊等并参与质押收益,从而实现每股资产净值的增长。这类创新模式迅速吸引了华尔街的关注——据报道,华尔街涌现出多家加密资产司库公司募集了数十亿美元资金,股价飙升,引来传奇投资人如 Stan Druckenmiller、Bill Miller 和 ARK 基金等入局。 传统资本市场的估值范式也由此正影响并重塑原生Web 3规则。这些公司虽名为“加密概念”,实际却按传统企业标准运营:以资产负债表和现金流定价,强调每股净资产、收益折现等基本面。例如,MicroStrategy(现更名为“Strategy”)自 2020 年以来大量购入比特币,其股票表现与比特币价格联动,被视作“准比特币 ETF”;以 BitMine Immersion 为代表的新一代 DAT 模式公司则更进一步,大胆通过股权和可转债融资换取以太坊持仓,并利用质押和 DeFi 策略提高资产收益。 这意味着,Web 3 生态正在构建一种“马斯洛式需求层级”的转移:从高风险冒险,走向安全、支付与信任的基本需求。 过去的 Web 3 充满投机与速度,而如今,随着资金和叙事的冷却,行业转向更稳健的构建期。比特币与以太坊市值占比的提升、VC 投资逻辑的转变、政策监管的推进,以及“DAT”等新型资产运作模式的兴起,都是“本分(BenFen)时代”来临的信号。 全球参与者正在“本分化”:一种行业成熟的迹象 如果说“节奏转变”是行业的外在表现,那么“本分化”则是更深层次的内在逻辑。所谓“本分”,是指不同角色都在回归到建设性、可持续的发展路径。 政策环境的演变正在塑造新的行业边界。美国的 GENIUS Act、欧盟的 MiCA、香港的稳定币牌照制度,虽然细节各异,但共识鲜明:保障投资者、强化透明度,为合规资金入场打开通道。对项目方而言,这意味着“擦边球”生意将越来越难,合规与透明将成为必须遵守的门槛。 •美国:《稳定币创新与保护法》(GENIUS Act)要求稳定币发行必须100%以高流动性资产(美元、短期美债等)作为储备,并强制发行方每月公开储备构成,以确保稳定币“名副其实”。 •欧盟:《加密资产市场管理条例》(MiCA)规定加密资产服务商(CASP)必须取得牌照并满足资本金等要求,对客户资产损失承担法律责任;稳定币发行人需保持1:1的准备金并定期披露,大型稳定币还将受欧洲央行和欧洲银行管理局(EBA)监管。 从搜索趋势来看,如果说 2021 年 Google Trends 上“DeFi”“NFT”“yield farming”等是区块链领域的高频关键词,那么 2024–2025 年,搜索热度的主角已悄然变成了“stablecoins”“compliance”“cross-border payment”。 尤其在欧盟《MiCA》实施和美国《GENIUS法案》签署等监管利好节点,而谷歌趋势也显示全球对“stablecoins”搜索热度在监管利好(如 MiCA 生效、美国《GENIUS 法案》签署)时飙升至历史高点(见下图)。 谷歌稳定币搜索(来源: Google Trends) 这些数据表明,行业增长虽未再呈现早期的爆发式狂欢,但却在稳健回升、增长可持续。从关键词的演变,不难看出行业从投机叙事转向稳定和应用场景的轨迹,区块链技术成为支付场景的基础设施技术底层。…

© 版权声明

相关文章