OKX Boost’s First X Launch Project: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Subsequent Participation StrategiesRecommended Articles
作者 |亞瑟( @Asher_0210 )
Last night, OKX Wallet launched OKX Boost and officially launched the first X Launch event, featuring Linea (LINEA), which attracted community attention.
Odaily Planet Daily immediately published ” Understanding the OKX Boost Participation Rules and How to Check Qualification for the First Phase Project, Linea ,” detailing the specific rules. Today, we will present more specific participation strategies and the underlying rationale, drawing on our own and community experience, for interested readers’ reference.
Cost-Benefit Analysis of OKX Boost’s First X Launch Project, Linea
According to existing information, the total prize pool for the first phase of Boost is 162,022,478 LINEA tokens, approximately 162 million LINEA tokens. Calculated based on the OKX LINEA contract price of $0.0288 (OKX spot trading time is 23:00 Beijing time), the total prize pool is $4.66 million.
Currently, there are 19,400 users who meet the requirements and have participated in the activity, and the total transaction points for the activity are 63,400. Since there may still be users who meet the requirements but have not participated, the total transaction points will be higher. The cost and benefits are calculated based on the total transaction points of 80,000 and 100,000 on the end date as shown in the following table (all data are rounded off, and prices are based on pre-market prices):
According to the cost-benefit table for the first phase, when the total transaction points were 100,000, the 5-point tier performed best: the transaction loss within 15 days was approximately US$65, corresponding to a token airdrop income of US$230, and a net income of US$165; in contrast, the 8-point tier suffered a transaction loss of up to US$522, and although it received an airdrop income of US$368, the final net income was -US$154.
OKX Boost’s X Launch Subsequent Participation Strategy
Based on the analysis data from the first phase of the Linea project, we have summarized the following strategies for your reference when participating in subsequent X Launch projects.
First, the participating address must have a balance of at least $10 USD. We recommend a minimum of $50 USD, or even $100 USD, in stablecoin assets. The first phase required a balance of $10 USD, and it’s unclear whether the balance requirement will increase for the second phase. Therefore, a $10 USD balance is the baseline, but a $50 USD, or even $100 USD, in stablecoin assets is recommended.
Second, higher trading volume isn’t necessarily better; the 5-point tier is optimal. As points increase, transaction fees increase exponentially, so you can’t simply rely on high volume trading to boost your profits. Based on the first data period, the 15-day average daily trading volume was $512, corresponding to the 5-point tier, which yielded the highest net profit. Therefore, the 5-point tier, or even the 4-point tier, is a more reasonable daily goal; there’s no need to blindly pursue higher trading volume.
Third, choose altcoins with a 0.85% trading fee. Try to choose altcoins with large liquidity pools and stable prices. According to the Boost volume calculation rules, trading pairs are grouped, and each group receives a different volume bonus as follows (Boost volume = trading volume × multiplier). Category 1 and Category 2 trading with other tokens receive a 1x multiplier, corresponding to trading pairs with a 0.85% trading fee. Additionally, try to trade altcoins with large liquidity pools and minimal price volatility.
Finally, it should be noted that the specific activity rules will most likely be adjusted based on multiple factors such as real-time participation and the “generosity” of the online projects. The above “experience” is relatively static and only provides a reference for users who are currently interested in participating. Please also pay attention to official rule adjustments and the latest announcements.
Judging from historical experience, the answer is a high probability, but the price will not rise as soon as the interest rate is cut. Intuitively, the market equates an interest rate cut with a release of liquidity and upward asset prices. However, a look back over the past three decades reveals that the Fed’s rate cuts are far more complex than they appear. Sometimes they are preventative measures to address potential problems, and other times they are emergency bailouts to shore up the economy during a crisis. Since 1990, the Federal Reserve has experienced five major interest rate cut cycles, each driven by different economic contexts and policy motivations, resulting in distinct stock market reactions. Understanding the relationship between rate cuts and the market requires more than simply viewing them…